Sunday, October 14, 2012

Goss Grove Needs Your Vote

TIRED of political ads, yard signs, debates etc.
Here's a place where you can see your vote in action!

Join your neighbors this Thursday at 7 p.m. to elect new officers. It's GGNA election time and quarterly meeting. See you at 1919 Grove.

 Same deal -- dessert potluck and wine, plus a lively discussion about a new chair or co-chairs and other officers. More agenda items coming.

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Wonderful display on the history of our neighborhood!

Hello Neighbors.




Last night Loren and I went to see the exhibit about the history of

our neighborhood, on display at the Boulder Public Library, downtown

locale, in the exhibit hallway.



It is really worth seeing. It reminds us that our neighborhood history

has strong roots in Mexican American (Chicano/a) history. It was

really powerful to be there with Hispanics who grew up in this

neighborhood and hear them tell stories of how the women ran the

households and stood on the porches watching over the neighborhood and

all its kids. Stories of how the salt miners from New Mexico settled

right here in our very own homes.



The photos are great! I encourage you to go take a look and to

remember those who nurtured this neighborhood before we did. It makes

me love this little enclave of Boulder culture all the more.



Hope you are all having a beautiful fall.



Warmest Regards,

Andrea Montoya.

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Party Postponed--Sorry!

Jon and I need to postpone the neighborhood party. Sorry.
It was to be this Monday--Labor Day to celebrate our downsizing . . .
BUT we have 2 sick dogs . . .
Both will be OK, but getting the place clean and keeping it that way with one bloody ear and other problems you don't want described--just isn't going to work for us.
Promise another time for that pulled pork and champagne!!!!
Enjoy Labor Day!

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

We Are Soooooo Celebrating!!

Time to celebrate winning our downzoning issue.


Time to celebrate the end of summer


Time to celebrate living in Goss-Grove

Time to celebrate being the best neighborhood


Time to celebrate because it's time to celebrate!


Where: Jon and Jerrie Hurd's backyard--2010 Goss Street (little yellow house with the big-big dogs who are not invited)


When: Labor Day--September 3 starting at 5 p.m. until we run out of food and/or beer

What: Jon and Jerrie will provide pulled pork and brats and a bottle of champagne and ice and . . .

YOU bring whatever else you want to eat or drink

Come one--come all.

RSVP: jerrie@jerriehurd.com 
303 444 3475

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

We Are SOOOOO Downzoned!!!


Boulder City Council approves Goss Grove downzoning

By Erica Meltzer Camera Staff Writer
Updated:   08/07/2012 09:51:19 PM MDT

The Boulder City Council on Tuesday night unanimously approved a rezoning in Goss Grove that is designed to preserve the existing mix of multi-unit and single-family housing and prevent more apartment buildings from being built in the central Boulder neighborhood.
The area will be downzoned from high-density residential to mixed residential, which will make it harder for multi-unit buildings to be built there.
The area targeted for rezoning lies roughly between 16th and 23rd streets and between Arapahoe Avenue and Canyon Boulevard, though the boundaries snake around property lines to pull in or exclude additional lots.
Nearly two dozen residents attended the City Council meeting to express support for the rezoning. They said the mix of long-term residents in single-family homes and students in rental properties is just right and that if more apartment buildings are built in the area, it will be harder for the "anchor families" to set the right tone.
One property owner asked to be excluded from the downzoning because his two rental properties are surrounded by apartment buildings.
Naropa University, which lies just outside the downzoned area, expressed opposition to the rezoning in a letter. Naropa officials said the measure will make it harder to create more student housing for the Buddhist university.
An amendment to exclude the property owner was defeated 5-4. The council members then voted unanimously to approve the downzoning.
Several City Council members said they want Naropa to stay in central Boulder and want to work with the university to meet its needs.




Monday, August 6, 2012

New Naropa Letter--Better!


Naropa still doesn't like the rezoning proposal but will not actively oppose it. That's the good news. The bad news would be for us to relax and not show up at the meeting TOMORROW night at 6 p.m. There are still others who are actively opposed. Council needs to understand the depth of our support. This is the finish line. We can't stop until we're over it.




August 4. 2012
Mayor Matt Appelbaum
City Council Office
P.O. Box 791
Boulder, CO 80306


Dear Mayor Appelbaum and members of the Boulder City Council,

We are writing to follow up on our letter of July 27, 2012 in which Naropa University expressed its  opposition to the proposed zoning change in the Goss-Grove area to RMX-1. As stated in that letter, that zoning change will make it very difficult for Naropa to advance  future development proposals which would allow the University to expand its administrative and residential needs in a compact way minimizing automobile use and maximizing an urban campus experience for our students. 

Following the submission of our position statement, Tom Hast, a member of the Naropa Board of Trustees and longtime Boulder resident, spoke with Louise Grauer, who suggested that we meet with her, along with Susan Richstone and Jessica Vaughan from the planning staff. That meeting took place yesterday together with incoming Naropa President Charles Lief and Director of Facilities Aaron Cook..

We would like to state for the record that we greatly appreciated both the tone and the content of our discussion. It was clear to us that the planning staff wants to understand Naropa’s views on planning and zoning issues and wants to engage in dialogue with us as we embark on a significant campus master planning exercise beginning in the near future.

We continue to believe that the proposed downzoning in the Goss-Grove area is an overly extreme means by which neighborhood concerns may be addressed and that the current requirement for robust examination of proposed developments through a comprehensive use review is a tool which would continue to serve the needs of both Naropa and the neighborhood we share. That being said, we understand that you are at the culmination of a long process, which, unfortunately we have not been party to since we expressed our view in early 2010.

While we have not changed our position since that letter was written, we have decided not to publically oppose the measure at this time.  We don’t believe that it is in Naropa University’s or the City of Boulder’s best interest for Naropa to make any statements at the Council meeting or to the Daily Camera regarding the zoning proposal. Yesterday’s story in the Camera was based on our letter of July 27 and not on any new contact with the reporter.  We are taking this position in recognition of all the hard work the planning staff has put in over the past few years on this proposal, as well as by the members of the Goss Grove neighborhood, our neighbors, and we trust that any specific proposals that we bring forward to the staff for consideration will be viewed in the same cooperative and creative light as our discussions yesterday led us to believe.

Sincerely,

Charles G. Lief, President

Sunday, August 5, 2012

Naropa University opposes Goss-Grove neighborhood rezoning: Daily Camera article

Article from Daily Camera Sunday, August 4th.  My perspective is that their position is rather disingenuous on several fronts. Realistically,  where could Naropa build a new dormitory within the rather small proposed zone (when plenty of available real estate is literally one block further north)?  I sincerely doubt that they were "completely taken by surprise" that zoning discussions were occurring.  Several Naropa staff are on the Goss Grove email list.  Goss-Grove has much more diversity than Naropa perhaps realizes. I doubt that in the proposed zone that Naropa is the primary presence.  Those that oppose the rezoning seem to forget that we did not have the choice to stay in the same zone as it will no longer exist.  Naropa is a fine neighbor, but they are acted a bit more entitled that I think is warranted. 
Jenny Devaud, 1935 Grove St


Boulder's Naropa University opposes Goss-Grove neighborhood rezoning


Zoning change would make it more difficult to build multi-unit buildings

By Mitchell Byars Camera Staff Writer




If you go What: Public hearing on Goss Grove re-zoning When: City Council meeting begins at 6 p.m. Tuesday, Where: Council Chambers, 1777 Broadway More info: Visit bouldercolorado.gov
Officials at Naropa University are opposing Boulder's proposal to rezone the Goss-Grove neighborhood, saying the new rules would make it harder for the university to expand near its main campus on Arapahoe Avenue.
Boulder City Council is set for a public hearing Tuesday on the zoning change, which would downgrade parts of the Goss-Grove neighborhood from high-density residential to mixed residential, or RMX-1, a change that would make it more difficult for multi-unit developments to be built in the area.
In a letter to City Council dated July 27 and made available in the council's agenda packet Thursday afternoon, Naropa officials wrote that they "strongly object to the proposed downzoning of the area to RMX-1."
Louise Grauer, a senior planner with the city, told the Camera in June that the university was on board with the zoning change in 2010. But Grauer said Thursday it appears the facilities manager she talked with in 2010 never consulted with the university's policymakers before leaving the school. Naropa was not notified directly by the city because its property is not in the area designated for rezoning.
"For that reason, the facility manager did not talk to policy people," Grauer said. "That person left after getting ill and there was no follow up."
Officials with Naropa did not return calls for comment Friday, but Grauer said she did discuss the rezoning with them on Wednesday after the city received the letter.
"It is so difficult to talk in hypotheticals," she said. "But it was a productive meeting."
Naropa's main concern centers around the rezoning's effect on the school's ability to expand near its main campus at 2130 Arapahoe Avenue, south of the Goss-Grove neighborhood. The university also has office buildings at 2111 Arapahoe Ave. and an apartment building at 1900 Goss Street. None of those buildings are in the area proposed for rezoning, but dorm buildings are not allowed in RMX-1 zones, which could hamper any attempts by the school to expand.
"Naropa needs to have the opportunity to grow our central campus by adding additional, suitable, properties that are within close walking distance for our students, staff and faculty," officials wrote in the letter. "If the Goss-Grove neighborhood is rezoned to RMX-1, it will make such expansion cost-prohibitive if not impossible.
"We believe that we are probably the largest presence and employer in the Goss-Grove neighborhood and would thereby be the most impacted by the proposed zoning change."
Grauer said that Naropa would still be able to buy existing apartment complexes and lease them as student housing as is. But she added that Naropa's expansion into the Goss-Grove neighborhood needs to be looked at as a separate issue from the rezoning.
"That's a bigger issue with the city, and I hope they will work with us to find the best solution," Grauer said. "They can continue to oppose the rezoning, that's their prerogative. But maybe expanding in the middle of this neighborhood is not the best thing."
The area that is proposed to be rezoned lies roughly between 16th and 23rd streets and between Arapahoe Avenue and Canyon Boulevard, though the boundaries snake around property lines to pull in or exclude additional lots.
"We think we've picked a boundary that best preserves the character of the neighborhood, which is our goal, Grauer said.
This process started in 2008 when the City Council instructed planners to take another look at the RH-2 zone, one of several high-density residential zones in the city and the current zoning of the Goss-Grove neighborhood. The zoning included a number of requirements -- a maximum unit size of 800 square feet, a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet as well as an allocation of 3,200 square feet of lot size per unit, and excessive parking requirements -- that made developing multi-unit projects difficult.
The proposed change to the RH-2 zone does away with the maximum unit size, reduces the parking requirements and allows one unit for every 3,000 square feet, which would allow a developer to put two units instead of one a 6,000-square-foot lot.
Grauer said a majority of the residents in the Goss-Grove area want to make it harder for multi-unit projects to be built, so the city began working on rezoning the area.
Despite a request from Naropa to take the item off Tuesday's agenda, City Council will have a public hearing on the rezoning and then decide to approve or deny the change.
"We think it should go forward," Grauer said. "We've been working with the neighbors for over two years. They're anxious to move forward."